Showing posts with label belief. Show all posts
Showing posts with label belief. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

Philosophy Wire: Look into the Eye…

In a big step for ophthalmology, scientists created a method to view the inner workings of the eye and its diseases at the cellular level. Currently, researchers can only see a broad section of the retina. This new technology allows them to zoom into just one part of a cell. In their words, they have accelerated the process for vision restoration. [1] Looking into the eye. Seeing into seeing. A world of mirrors. And we like it so much we enjoy polishing them until we forget they are there. Until we speak about them. And we analyze what we say about them. By speaking about what we said about them. Words for words. An eye for an eye. A cosmos for a life. How can you believe you are here? If you cannot see yourself breathing?

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…

Sunday, October 10, 2021

Santa Claus exists. And tooth fairies. And mermaids. Oh, and so do you…

Photo by Spiros Kakos @ Pexels

Small children believe in Santa Claus. They are thrilled when the presents arrive and even try to find proof that he exists by placing cookies for the saint to eat along with a glass of milk…

But we are grown ups. We know that he doesn’t exist.

And we all struggle and question ourselves. Should we let them be? Should we perpetuate the lie or should we inform our children that he is just a fantasy, along with fairies and unicorns?

Such a wrong dilemma.
Rational people tied up into the chains that they created.
Could we be more wrong?

I am not going to get into the ‘Saint Nicolas was a real person’ line of thinking. Indeed Saint Nicolas was a real person and he indeed gave gifts to the poor. One could simply argue (and he would not be far away from the truth) that it is the spirit of Saint Nicolas – a very real person that did exist – that still endures and makes all those presents be. Every parent follows his example when he or she is dressing up like Santa Claus (a name Saint Nicolas came be known by because of his Dutch nickname, Sintar Klaas – see here).

I could also go into more extreme arguments, like the quantum superposition argument. One can read here an interesting article on how Santa Claus exists and is in fact a macroscopic quantum phenomenon, with its wavefunction collapsing into ‘dad’ when Santa Claus is observed. It is quite amusing to see how our definition of reality and the limited knowledge we have about it can give birth to multiple ideas that question the most common of our beliefs. Do not take this article as an amusement article only. Our knowledge for reality IS limited. Our senses and NOT reliable. We know NOTHING about being or existence per se. As Oscar Wilde once said, the most serious things are said in jokes…

But there is a more fundamental line of thinking that can explain and justify the existence of Santa Claus. As Harmonia Philosophica has tried to explain for years and years, asking the simple questions is the way of true philosophers. And as many of you know, philosophers have been trying to find out answer to the most fundamental questions of humankind but with no success. Many might believe that this means they have failed. But that would be incorrect. For the purpose of true philosophers is not to lead to the truth, but to make it clear that we can know nothing about it. Because such thing as the ‘truth’ does not exist. (Non-thinking is the way towards the cosmos, try to read more in Harmonia Philosophica about it).

So let us re-examine our question.

“Does Santa Claus exist?”

Aristotle once said that any question contains its answer. So true. “Does Santa Claus exist?”. A phenomenally simple and innocent question that is loaded with so many beliefs and so much dogmatism. A question saying so many things about the people who ask it. It implies that we know about existence. It implies that we know who and what exists and what does not. It implies that non-existence is also… existent. Last but certainly not least, by asking about the existence of Santa Claus we clearly imply that he might not exist. We wouldn’t be asking for the existence of our self for example, would we?

“Does Santa exist?”
Let me ask another thing though.
What about you?
Do YOU exist?

Foolish question it seems. But not so foolish after careful consideration. How do I know you are there? Perhaps because of some undeniable proof? Should I take your word for it? Why should I believe you are a human and not a perfectly programmed robot? How could I know you are saying what you say because of your own free will and not because your cells are programmed to do so? Could you convince me your are not a zombie? (The Zombie argument is a cool argument by the way for the existence or non-existence of consciousness)

Mermaids exist. They just hide beneath rocks when we look for them…
~ unknown kid

What is more, what IS existence? What does it mean to exist? Philosophers for thousands of years have not solved that problem, so how could you even consider saying that you exist? What IS Being? The greatest philosophers of all times failed to give an answer. So how could you be so arrogant to claim that you “are” and others not? What IS reality? Who can claim that he or she has access to that magical thing called ‘reality’ without discarding thousands of years of philosophy trying and failing to find out what that thing is? Even for the phenomena we observe, the surface of the ocean we swim in, our senses and science can only explain a minor fraction of that world; let alone things that lie beyond our senses. So what makes you so arrogant as to ask such a dramatic question?

The only argument you have for your existence is your feeling and knowledge that you do. Feelings and knowledge that you cannot transmit to others no matter how hard you try.

Guess what.

Santa Claus exists for children for exactly the same reasons!

This is not a shallow trick-argument to solve the problem. No. As already mentioned above, our total lack of knowledge regarding what existence and being are is totally true. Our total inability to know what ‘reality’ is also is something totally true. What we really KNOW are the things we have immediate experience of. Our existence. Our thoughts. Our consciousness. A peach we eat. A lonely summer night. The love of our parents that are here. Santa Claus bringing gifts which we sleep…

Something magical.
And because of that, truer that anything can ever be.
You see, magic in life is something we forgot. And yet, it still drives our destiny.
Love is magical. Our own life is magical. Santa is magical.

But we got carried away. And again we forgot the simple question we started with. “What about you?” we asked. Tell me my child, do you exist? How do you know? More importantly. How do I know? All my science, all my knowledge, all my philosophy cry out loud that I could never be certain for the existence of anyone else than me. And yet, I am certain for your existence. More than I am certain about my own!

You see…

It is not Santa Claus that is magic.
It was never a question of whether he existed.
It is all about you my child.
It was about you from the beginning.
You are magical!

Believing in good in a place full of evil. Loving and caring without expecting anything in return.

You DO exist!

Now go get your presents.

Santa was here while you were asleep…

Saturday, May 1, 2021

Καλή Ανάσταση! (On the irrationality of the modern belief in death)

Happy Easter! (“Καλή Ανάσταση” in Greek literally means ‘Happy Resurrection’)

And let not the irrationality of the miracle of resurrection hinder you from believing.

The most important things in life we anyway do not understand.

Our self.
Being.
The cosmos itself.

And yet we are defined by them. And we live by them.
Yes, the resurrection is irrational.
And that is why it is true. (refer to “Resurrection – Illogical, thus True.“)

Because knowing is not about understanding, as Shestov said.

You think you need to believe in order to accept the resurrection.
But it is the other way around…
You already believe so many things and that is why you accept death.

Think again.
Time. Existence. Matter. Identity. Me. You. The notion of change itself.
Who told you these exist?

Do not ask whether Christ was risen.
But instead.
Could you ever die?

PS. Refer to the “What does it take to believe in Death” series of articles at the Blogger Harmonia Philosophica portal for more extensive coverage of the ideas that support our belief in Death. I was much younger when I wrote it and did not wrote so eloquently as now (at least not as much as I believe I do anyway), but my ideas were far more clear and raw. Thus, I still like them. Hope you like them too.

Saturday, March 21, 2020

Philosophy Wire: False beliefs…

New findings suggest that feedback, rather than hard evidence, boosts people's sense of certainty when learning new things or trying to tell right from wrong. [1] In the beginning we knew nothing. But then we started believing things. We knew they were right because of the feedback we got. A feedback coming out of nothing, as our beliefs in the first place. Inexistent beings. Trying to convince themselves that they exist. In a cosmos full of nothing, we started seeing things. And verifying our self that we are correct in seeing them. Wandering on a black blanket. Dancing on the edge. Afraid to fall apart. Only because we do not remember how we got there in the first place. Believe that you will die. Stop believing in yourself. And you will discover that you do exist… Falling over… From where you never were…

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…

Sunday, February 4, 2018

Philosophy Wire: Atheists and religious people, not fearing death…

Atheists and deeply religious people seem to be the ones less worried about death. [1] Believing too much. By believing nothing. Two sides of the same coin. Look closely at nothingness. And you will see that it is full of everything…

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Philosophy Wire: Humans and Animals. Two different things...


Philosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2014-10-30]: Human sense of fairness evolved to favor long-term cooperation, primate study suggests. [1] We believe we are the same as the animals. We believe we are not moral. We believe we are not free to behave as we like. But we are. And we can indeed be immoral animals. If we believe it too much...

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Philosophy Wire: Sagan, death, materialism, dogmatism and why we are not just a "pale blue dot"...


Philosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2014-05-27]:

Sagan talking about death to his daughter Sasha: "[...] it can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. You can get tricked if you don't question yourself and others, especially people in a position of authority. [...] anything that's truly real can stand up to scrutiny." But it's not all doom and gloom. Sasha describes how her father tried to impart upon her the wonder of being alive. "We are star stuff, my dad famously said, and he made me feel that way," she writes. [1]
Sagan always had the best way to say the most death-loving things.*
We want to believe we are dead.
We want to believe we are just obedient (to physical laws) dust.
And we dare to call that "living".
And we have the nerve to call dreamers those who do not share our vision of nothingness.
How rude...

* Remember the epic "We are just a blue dot"... Sure. A small dot of consciousness defining the universe in its every aspect. (see Mind and Morphogenetic fields article)

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…

Saturday, December 22, 2012

The Unbelieving Thomas v3.0

get-image

A video showing a golden eagle catching a small child at a park and tried to drag it into the air to eat it, went viral on the Internet in a few hours after its release.[1] Even though the video was absolutely realistic, many people rushed to doubt its trueness. Their doubts were not objective, since they were based not on technical flaws of the video but on the "reaction" of the father of the child which some people found "mild". [2]

But that is not a valid objection to decide if something is "fake" if you ask me. Anyone could be caught off guard from such a strange once-in-a-lifetime event and possibly not react immediatelly. The parent in the video did run towards the child. Was it that he was not screaming weird? Possibly others could find him screaming as an indication of "fake over-reaction". The possibilities are endless.

Finally it was revealed that the video was indeed fake, created by a team of college students studying cinematography. [3] But the lesson to be learned is this: If someone does not want to believe something, then not even a video will make him believe. Not even a photo. Not even a recorded sound. Because in ANY CASE you can find excuses for not believing. After all, isn't that what magicians like Copperfield do? They trick us into believing something that is not real.

But wait a minute...

What are we going to believe then? And based on what "evidence" if all evidence can be tampered with?As a new version of the Unbelieving Thomas, we would not be satisfied by touching the nail marks on Jesus resurrected body. We would examine him over and over again until we found out the "trick". Because if someone does not want to believe something, not even live evidence will convince him.

Maybe finally it is all a matter of choice. What exists is what we CHOOSE to Be. Yes, Quantum Mechanics has showed the way towards such a radical view of the cosmos. We are part of it and as conscious observers we formulate reality at Will.

Maybe that is why imagination develops first and logic second in a child’s life. Maybe Nature tries to tell us something here.

Imagine being. Imagine living. Imagine seeing...


Friday, January 20, 2012

Philosophy Wire: IBM, a map, religions and revolutions

1EC31962E04F9D0A9DD979775EEF29ECPhilosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2012-01-20]: IBM scientists managed to create the smallest world map with dimensions 22 x 11 μm [source: web news]. They claim that the method they developed MAY open new ways in nanotechnology. Science is often consumed in such vague promises. New methods which MAY SOMEDAY SOMEHOW result in a “REVOLUTION” in the way we do things… Why do people like hearing such promises? Why do they believe them? Why do some prefer them against other similar and more practical promises (i.e. promises by religions to provide comfort here and now) ?

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Philosophy Wire: Gaddhafi, desert, death and life…

sahara-desertPhilosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2011-10-25]: Gadhafi was buried somewhere in the desert [source: web news]. We all die sometime. And even if death is the simplest and clearest of all things, we fear it the most and prefer the illogical and complicated life without knowing why… And when you do not know why you prefer something the solution may be simple: you could be wrong. Γελαστούλης

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Philosophy Wire: Do you believe your eyes?

british_teenager_bikes_on_top_of_water_for_charity_wont_say_howPhilosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2011-07-19]: A young cyclist run on his bike on the surface of a 75 foot deep lake for charity purposes [source: Yahoo! Sports News]. The man does not reveal how he did what he did, but claims the photo is real. He also claims that many people saw him do it and can verify this is not a camera trick.  Do you believe your eyes? Do you trust other people’s testimony?
PS. ATTENTION! Answering those questions can have more serious philosophical impact than you can imagine…

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Philosophy Wire: bin Laden, Gadhafi son, truth, lies, “facts”, faith and politics

Philosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2011-05-03]: Libyans claim that the son of Gadhafi is dead (among with some of his grandchildren) and the Catholic bishop cinforms it. However western allies are sceptical over the news. On the other hand the US is announcing the death of Osama bin Laden, but says that his body was thrown at the sea while no photos are being released (except a fake one which was redrawn). Everyone believes that. Despite on what the truth is (if such thing ever exists), it is quite remarkable how politics and passions are dictating “reality” today, instead of philosophy…

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...