(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…
Tuesday, August 27, 2024
Philosophy Wire: Look into the Eye…
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…
Sunday, October 10, 2021
Santa Claus exists. And tooth fairies. And mermaids. Oh, and so do you…
![]() |
| Photo by Spiros Kakos @ Pexels |
But we are grown ups. We know that he doesn’t exist.
And we all struggle and question ourselves. Should we let them be? Should we perpetuate the lie or should we inform our children that he is just a fantasy, along with fairies and unicorns?
Such a wrong dilemma.
Rational people tied up into the chains that they created.
Could we be more wrong?
I am not going to get into the ‘Saint Nicolas was a real person’ line of thinking. Indeed Saint Nicolas was a real person and he indeed gave gifts to the poor. One could simply argue (and he would not be far away from the truth) that it is the spirit of Saint Nicolas – a very real person that did exist – that still endures and makes all those presents be. Every parent follows his example when he or she is dressing up like Santa Claus (a name Saint Nicolas came be known by because of his Dutch nickname, Sintar Klaas – see here).
I could also go into more extreme arguments, like the quantum superposition argument. One can read here an interesting article on how Santa Claus exists and is in fact a macroscopic quantum phenomenon, with its wavefunction collapsing into ‘dad’ when Santa Claus is observed. It is quite amusing to see how our definition of reality and the limited knowledge we have about it can give birth to multiple ideas that question the most common of our beliefs. Do not take this article as an amusement article only. Our knowledge for reality IS limited. Our senses and NOT reliable. We know NOTHING about being or existence per se. As Oscar Wilde once said, the most serious things are said in jokes…
But there is a more fundamental line of thinking that can explain and justify the existence of Santa Claus. As Harmonia Philosophica has tried to explain for years and years, asking the simple questions is the way of true philosophers. And as many of you know, philosophers have been trying to find out answer to the most fundamental questions of humankind but with no success. Many might believe that this means they have failed. But that would be incorrect. For the purpose of true philosophers is not to lead to the truth, but to make it clear that we can know nothing about it. Because such thing as the ‘truth’ does not exist. (Non-thinking is the way towards the cosmos, try to read more in Harmonia Philosophica about it).
So let us re-examine our question.
“Does Santa Claus exist?”
Aristotle once said that any question contains its answer. So true. “Does Santa Claus exist?”. A phenomenally simple and innocent question that is loaded with so many beliefs and so much dogmatism. A question saying so many things about the people who ask it. It implies that we know about existence. It implies that we know who and what exists and what does not. It implies that non-existence is also… existent. Last but certainly not least, by asking about the existence of Santa Claus we clearly imply that he might not exist. We wouldn’t be asking for the existence of our self for example, would we?
“Does Santa exist?”
Let me ask another thing though.
What about you?
Do YOU exist?
Foolish question it seems. But not so foolish after careful consideration. How do I know you are there? Perhaps because of some undeniable proof? Should I take your word for it? Why should I believe you are a human and not a perfectly programmed robot? How could I know you are saying what you say because of your own free will and not because your cells are programmed to do so? Could you convince me your are not a zombie? (The Zombie argument is a cool argument by the way for the existence or non-existence of consciousness)
What is more, what IS existence? What does it mean to exist? Philosophers for thousands of years have not solved that problem, so how could you even consider saying that you exist? What IS Being? The greatest philosophers of all times failed to give an answer. So how could you be so arrogant to claim that you “are” and others not? What IS reality? Who can claim that he or she has access to that magical thing called ‘reality’ without discarding thousands of years of philosophy trying and failing to find out what that thing is? Even for the phenomena we observe, the surface of the ocean we swim in, our senses and science can only explain a minor fraction of that world; let alone things that lie beyond our senses. So what makes you so arrogant as to ask such a dramatic question?
The only argument you have for your existence is your feeling and knowledge that you do. Feelings and knowledge that you cannot transmit to others no matter how hard you try.
Guess what.
Santa Claus exists for children for exactly the same reasons!
This is not a shallow trick-argument to solve the problem. No. As already mentioned above, our total lack of knowledge regarding what existence and being are is totally true. Our total inability to know what ‘reality’ is also is something totally true. What we really KNOW are the things we have immediate experience of. Our existence. Our thoughts. Our consciousness. A peach we eat. A lonely summer night. The love of our parents that are here. Santa Claus bringing gifts which we sleep…
Something magical.
And because of that, truer that anything can ever be.
You see, magic in life is something we forgot. And yet, it still drives our destiny.
Love is magical. Our own life is magical. Santa is magical.
But we got carried away. And again we forgot the simple question we started with. “What about you?” we asked. Tell me my child, do you exist? How do you know? More importantly. How do I know? All my science, all my knowledge, all my philosophy cry out loud that I could never be certain for the existence of anyone else than me. And yet, I am certain for your existence. More than I am certain about my own!
You see…
It is not Santa Claus that is magic.
It was never a question of whether he existed.
It is all about you my child.
It was about you from the beginning.
You are magical!
Believing in good in a place full of evil. Loving and caring without expecting anything in return.
You DO exist!
Now go get your presents.
Santa was here while you were asleep…
Saturday, May 1, 2021
Καλή Ανάσταση! (On the irrationality of the modern belief in death)
Saturday, March 21, 2020
Philosophy Wire: False beliefs…
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…
Sunday, February 4, 2018
Philosophy Wire: Atheists and religious people, not fearing death…
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Philosophy Wire: Humans and Animals. Two different things...
Philosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2014-10-30]: Human sense of fairness evolved to favor long-term cooperation, primate study suggests. [1] We believe we are the same as the animals. We believe we are not moral. We believe we are not free to behave as we like. But we are. And we can indeed be immoral animals. If we believe it too much...
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Philosophy Wire: Sagan, death, materialism, dogmatism and why we are not just a "pale blue dot"...
Philosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2014-05-27]:
Sagan talking about death to his daughter Sasha: "[...] it can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. You can get tricked if you don't question yourself and others, especially people in a position of authority. [...] anything that's truly real can stand up to scrutiny." But it's not all doom and gloom. Sasha describes how her father tried to impart upon her the wonder of being alive. "We are star stuff, my dad famously said, and he made me feel that way," she writes. [1]
Sagan always had the best way to say the most death-loving things.*
We want to believe we are dead.
We want to believe we are just obedient (to physical laws) dust.
And we dare to call that "living".
And we have the nerve to call dreamers those who do not share our vision of nothingness.
How rude...
* Remember the epic "We are just a blue dot"... Sure. A small dot of consciousness defining the universe in its every aspect. (see Mind and Morphogenetic fields article)
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective…
Saturday, December 22, 2012
The Unbelieving Thomas v3.0
A video showing a golden eagle catching a small child at a park and tried to drag it into the air to eat it, went viral on the Internet in a few hours after its release.[1] Even though the video was absolutely realistic, many people rushed to doubt its trueness. Their doubts were not objective, since they were based not on technical flaws of the video but on the "reaction" of the father of the child which some people found "mild". [2]
But that is not a valid objection to decide if something is "fake" if you ask me. Anyone could be caught off guard from such a strange once-in-a-lifetime event and possibly not react immediatelly. The parent in the video did run towards the child. Was it that he was not screaming weird? Possibly others could find him screaming as an indication of "fake over-reaction". The possibilities are endless.
Finally it was revealed that the video was indeed fake, created by a team of college students studying cinematography. [3] But the lesson to be learned is this: If someone does not want to believe something, then not even a video will make him believe. Not even a photo. Not even a recorded sound. Because in ANY CASE you can find excuses for not believing. After all, isn't that what magicians like Copperfield do? They trick us into believing something that is not real.
But wait a minute...
What are we going to believe then? And based on what "evidence" if all evidence can be tampered with?As a new version of the Unbelieving Thomas, we would not be satisfied by touching the nail marks on Jesus resurrected body. We would examine him over and over again until we found out the "trick". Because if someone does not want to believe something, not even live evidence will convince him.
Maybe finally it is all a matter of choice. What exists is what we CHOOSE to Be. Yes, Quantum Mechanics has showed the way towards such a radical view of the cosmos. We are part of it and as conscious observers we formulate reality at Will.
Maybe that is why imagination develops first and logic second in a child’s life. Maybe Nature tries to tell us something here.
Imagine being. Imagine living. Imagine seeing...
Friday, January 20, 2012
Philosophy Wire: IBM, a map, religions and revolutions
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Philosophy Wire: Gaddhafi, desert, death and life…
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Philosophy Wire: Do you believe your eyes?
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Philosophy Wire: bin Laden, Gadhafi son, truth, lies, “facts”, faith and politics
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...


