Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Philosophy Wire: Syria, US healthcare and the "holy" revolutions...

new-york-13Philosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2011-08-02]: UN Security Council failed to reach a consensus regarding sanctions on Syria. Russia, China and other countries are afraid that a UN Resolution against Syria might open the way for military action against this key Middle-East country. However can the great powers actually start another war? Do they have the money for a new war? Do they have the legal justification for a new war? It is not about nuclear weapons anymore (see Iraq). It is not even about world terrorism (see Afghanistan). If the UN gets involved in favor of every new revolution, where would that stop? It is sadly true that many Syrians are killed each day. But many US citizens are also dead every day due to lack of free healthcare. Should we impose sanctions on US as well? Well, better no. They have enough trouble getting cash to pay checks (let alone conduct a new war)...  But should we not fight for human rights? Yes we should! But how many of us actually KNOW what happens in Syria? How many of us actually KNOW who fights against who in Syria? Tanks against citizens is a terrible thing. But an image alone may be misleading. Will actually the thousands of citizens on the Syrian roads be peaceful if they take over? And if all the innocent citizens are "fleeing in terror" [BBC News], against whom are those tanks fighting anyway? Let's stop discussing for things we cannot do (a new war), or for things we should not do (interfere everywhere and anytime in favor of anyone we wish in the name of "human rights", without having knowledge of what happens)... In todays artificial complicated world, the "help the good revolutionists" it too simple to be true...

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Philosophy Wire: Libya, International Law and the limits of foreign country intervention for the protection of human rights...


Philosophy Wire by Spiros Kakos [2011-02-26]: The international community is imposing sanctions to Libya, while thoughts of NATO intervention are lingering in the "air"... In the context of "International Law", every "civilized" (western) leader is ready to intervene in a foreign country in order to defend "human rights". But what are these human rights? Is the self-determination a "human right"? Is the right to "conduct civil" war a human right of a country's peoples? Would we like our neighbor to come into our house when he hears a fight? Would we like "aliens" to intervene during the Second World War? What constitues a "war crime", that may give the right of NATO to invade legally sovereign countries? If today the international community has the "right" to intervene in Libya due to the "unjust massacre" of protesters there, we should also consider answering the question: is there a "just massacre"? How many western leaders now crying for "justice", had been going out for dinner with Gadhafi only months ago? The limits of "international law" are based on many definitions. And definitions are always subjective...

(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...